Comments on Wall Street jitters and UK housing

August 10, 2007 at 4:46 pm | In bank of england, ftse, housing market, subprime, wall street | 24 Comments

Reputable economist Fionnuala Earley of Nationwide Building Society this afternoon released the following statement on the Wall Street selloff and its potential impact on the UK housing sector:

the implications for the UK housing market … could mean that wholesale funding costs will increase and that lenders tighten up their own criteria, particularly those that are very dependent on wholesale funding. However, if the Bank of England see these current developments as a real threat to the City, this is likely to reduce the risk of further increases in interest rates, counteracting some of that effect.” [emphasis added]

Earley’s comments are somewhat contradictory in nature to the tone Mervyn King and the BoE set in his press conference 2 days ago. Paul Tucker, the banks Executive Director for Markets stated that the fundamental pressures in the financial markets – driven mainly by the subprime crises – was isolated.
King said that he doesn’t make any predictions on the housing market, but that he was ’surprised’ by housing’s resilience. He adamantly stated he would not use interest rate policy to bail out ‘unwise lenders’ and claimed to find no real challenge to the global ‘macro-economic outlook’.
However, it appears central banks around the world beg to differ with King’s analysis. In response to the crises, Japan’s central bank injected one trillion yen (£4.2bn) into the Tokyo market, The European Central Bank pumped €61bn (£41bn) into European markets; Bernanke’s Fed added $24bn (£12bn) to the US banking system and the Australian central bank took similar action.

What prompted the interventions from the central banks was that overnight money interest rates shot up this week because cash was scarce. In other words, the price of money rose because it was in short supply.
As of late today, it appeared that the huge injections of funds in the US, Europe and beyond had had the effect of pushing those overnight rates back down again, relieving the pressure on the banking system, for now at least.
[guardian emphasis added]

With the price of money rising, no doubt consumer banks will pass those rising cost onto consumers. Yet King remains silent, even though the FTSE’s crumbling.
Will or will not his actions prove beneficial to UK consumers is the 64 billion dollar question du jour.

Subprime meltdown: New Century virtually bankrupt

March 27, 2007 at 6:54 pm | In bubble, subprime, wall street | Leave a Comment

If this is a “shade of the new blue chip”, then we’re all in deep shit!

[From WSJ via Seeking Alpha]

Analysts are speculating that New Century Financial, the beleaguered subprime mortgage lender, will shortly file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Their evidence is the disclosure that Barclays and Morgan Stanley, two of New Century’s main lenders, are repossessing loans that had been used to secure financing. New Century will hand over the loans it made with Barclays credit lines; in exchange, it will be forgiven the obligation to buy back $900 million of those loans. Morgan Stanley will auction off $2.48 billion of New Century subprime mortgages that constitute the collateral behind New Century’s $2.5 billion credit line from the investment bank. Stifel Nicolaus analyst Christopher Brendler: Both banks “felt so uncomfortable with” New Century’s ability to repay them that “they decided to just take the loans and auction them off themselves…I’m surprised that New Century hasn’t filed for bankruptcy already.” All New Century’s lenders are pulling their financing, and it has received default notices from Barclays, Bank of America, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, among others. If all its lenders demand mortgage repurchases simultaneously, New Century could owe $8.4 billion, an impossible sum that would force the company’s liquidation.

What’s going on with subprime?

March 14, 2007 at 10:21 am | In ftse, investment, mortgage, stock market, subprime, wall street | 5 Comments

All the talk on Wall Street and in the financial world this week has been centered around subprime mortgages and its effect on stock markets in particular and the overall economy in general. With the spectacular collapse of a few US based subprime lenders, many are proclaiming the end to end all ends. But is this really so?
Closing Specialist Diane Cipa in her blog offers some insider insight into the world of the subprime lender:

I believe subprime mortgage lenders and investment bankers factored into their risk analysis ridiculous lending standards and even probably accounted for a certain amount of borrower fraud. Anyone who makes loans without documentation and without borrower equity does so with open eyes. The yield offset the risk, so la-de-da.
The flaw in their analysis, the missing layer of risk to which lenders themselves were oblivious was fraud perpetrated by lending personnel, both inside employees and mortgage brokers. That’s the nasty secret blatantly obvious to me and I have to think many honest lending and title professionals. Maybe not. Maybe I just thought it had to be obvious because of my underwriting background.
I have wondered for years why lender quality control departments weren’t picking up the garbage and doing away with it.

Food for thought and as Buffett told us last week: be greedy when others are fearful, and fearful when others are greedy. I’m about to get my greed on

Grunt’s advice (for everybody) on the bonus bump

January 3, 2007 at 10:37 am | In manhattan, wall street | Leave a Comment

Manhattan’s “soldier in the trenches” of the real estate war (aka Property Grunt) issued a cautionary word of advice on the bonus bump, which many brokers in New York are expecting to drive the Manhattan Market. Grunt claims that the bonuses have brokers “creaming in their jeans”, but advises that:

Wall Street people are not stupid. They are not like lottery winners who blow their first million as soon as they get it. Those who are granted bonus status are going to pay for the operating costs of life, e.g school loans or into an asset class that will give them more bang for their buck. If they decide to buy, they will be looking for the best deal they can get. Even if they are willing to pay top dollar for a home, they will demand and expect their requirements be fulfilled for the premium they are paying.
Honestly, I am sick and tired of brokers putting their eggs in one basket as they start screaming and raving how bonus season is going to pull a mighty mouse and save the day. How all the buyers who are sitting on the sidelines better jump in or else they will be crushed by bonus. Because bonus is the viagra of the residential market and there is no way to tell how long it will maintain it’s potency and continue to thrust itself into rising prices.

Grunt’s overall assessment on the NYC market in general

Those of you need to buy, make sure you can afford the payments and stay the hell away from interest only or exotic mortgages. Stick to the tried and true fixed rate. Those of you who wish to invest, remember to do your due diligence and if the deal doesn’t make sense. Walk away. The cashflow has to make sense or you are going to royally screw yourself over. If you are a seller, exercise common sense and consider reducing your prices if you are not generating interest.

Solid!

Expert predictions for 2007

December 29, 2006 at 12:57 pm | In economy, forecast, ftse, global economy, politics, wall street, war | 3 Comments

So many different opinions on the current state of the property market and where it’s headed in 2007. In the UK for example, the FT reports that most analysts are predicting the housing market will cool next year; but given that so many of them were wrong about 2006, it’s hard to know what to expect or who to believe going forward. The big story in the US is this years “housing bubble” which hasn’t burst yet; and seems to have the experts dumbfounded and confused as to whether or not it will happen. Here’s a few predictions:

….

US BUBBLE

Mauldin: When Will the Housing Market Bottom?

Look at this very interesting chart from one of my favorite analysts, Professor Robert Shiller of Yale. This chart tracks housing prices, adjusted for inflation, since 1890. This is on existing houses and not new construction. It is easy to see that the recent boom is a bubble. Since 1997, the index has risen 83%. Shiller talks about housing regressing to the mean over time. That could mean a lot more than a 20% drop in housing prices and another 12 months to the bottom. A drop to the mean could be over 40%. That is rather hard to imagine.

Jain: Has Housing Bottomed In the US? Data and Fifth Grade Math Says No

“Look at this figure, a sad example of what lies ahead for the housing mess. Yes, it is a one big mess, maybe the biggest mess ever that I know of. Now, you never want to make the mistake of ever getting such a graph out to the public. You keep this to yourself and find some other facts that you can spin. For example, Housing Scams are up, permits are down 30%, and housing starts are down 26% from year earlier. Then, summarily claim that the housing is in the process or bottoming or has already bottomed. You never want to give a number for what the current rate of the housing demand is, unless you can quote someone’s false claims about the demand. Use vague phrases like demographics, immigrants, to give a sense of demand far greater than the actual demand shown by the survey data.”

Schiff: Sub-Prime Disaster in the Making
The main problem is that the majority of these loans were made to people who really cannot afford to repay them and were collateralized by properties whose true values were but a fraction of the loan amounts. Once the music stops and prices return to earth, borrowers who put little or no money down may decide to simply mail in their house keys rather than make additional mortgage payments. Why would anyone stretch to spend 40% of his or her monthly income to service a $700,000 mortgage on a condo valued at $500,000, especially when there are plenty of comparable rentals that are far more affordable?

NYT: Dow Hits New High as Sales of New Homes Pick Up
While the housing market has been in the midst of a sharp slowdown in recent months — some economists are calling it a full-blown housing recession — the damage to the economy has been limited so far. The decline in residential construction during the summer months knocked more than a full percentage point off of the nation’s gross domestic product growth, pulling it down to 2 percent in the third quarter.
But strength in other areas of the economy — consumer spending and commercial construction, for example — has helped to keep growth from stalling.

Bloomberg: New-Home Sales Rise More Than Forecast
Sales of new homes in the U.S. rose more than forecast last month as lower mortgage rates and more incentives helped builders reduce inventory. The figures add to evidence that the slowdown in construction may take less of toll on the economy early next year than it did last quarter. Even with the decline last month, the number of unsold homes remains near a record high, making it less likely homebuilding will strengthen outright, limiting economic growth, economists said.

NY Observer: Gaze Into the Crystal Ball of Housing in 2007, and Shrug
A federal government report on Wednesday showed stronger-than-expected new home sales nationwide in November over October. And a report out on Thursday shows existing home sales were also stronger in November than in the month before. Mortgage applications, too, have been up since the summer, rising as much as 12 percent from August through this month, according to a new report from a leading trade group.
These statistics have buoyed the spirits of some, including likely suspects such as brokers and sellers. But the optimism is often – and rightfully – tempered by variables, such as: Will interest rates go up? Will energy costs rise? Will home construction ebb, allowing inventories of unsold homes to dwindle? Will any national statistics ever truly matter to some local markets, like Manhattan’s?
Unfortunately, for these questions, only time will likely tell.

UK PREDICTIONS

FT: Visions vary on the fortunes of property
The message is clear: if you want to gain an understanding of how the market will perform next year, be prepared to keep a close eye the latest projections for growth in gross domestic product.

Walayat: Interest Rate Forecast for 2007 – Bank of England to do Battle with Inflation
I am sticking with the earlier forecast of UK interest rates hitting 5.25% by March 2007 and possibly even going as high as 5.75% during the 2nd half of 2007 as the Bank of England is forced to reign in inflation as it hits the upper boundary of 3% (CPI).
The risks to the forecast are a sharp drop in the UK housing market or sharp slowdown in the UK Economy, though thus far the rise to 5% has failed to have an impact on either.

Fionnuala Earley, Nationwide Group
The number of estate agents reporting an increase in new buyer enquiries fell back sharply in November, and while this is a more volatile indicator of house purchase approvals, it does lend some support to the view that we will soon see the start of some weakening in demand.

Savills: UK Residential Research Bulletin
There is no housing market bubble – yet. Only a severe external economic shock or very unpleasant inflationary surprise could cause prices to reduce substantially from current levels. Few housing market analysts now use historic levels of house price
to income ratios as an indication that the housing market is overheated. Those that do come rapidly, and erroneously, to the conclusion that house prices must fall substantially in order to correct this anomaly.

FTAdviser: Britain saving badly
Almost one in three UK adults failed to save a penny this year, according to research from Alliance and Leicester. Encouragingly, the survey revealed that most people earmarked 2007 as the year they will begin to adequately save, with 31% saying that they have realised the implications of not building up savings.

STOCK MARKET/CURRENCY

Nathan Lewis: The End of the 1972 Bull Market
Housing valuations today are WAAAAY higher than in 1972, when they were still in recovery after being crushed in 1970. … If there is one good thing today, it’s that tax brackets are adjusted for the CPI, thus minimizing “bracket creep,” a big source of effective tax hikes during the 1970s. Also, capital gains, though still not CPI adjusted, are taxed at much lower rates than they were then (35%-50%).
Thus, based on this analogy alone, we can create some hypothetical “back to the 1970s” scenarios for 2007:

1) The dollar [vs gold] will sink below its previous low of $730/oz. and head quickly to $1000/oz.

2) The stock market will begin to decline when the dollar makes new lows vs. gold, if not a bit sooner (maybe the $680/oz. region).

3) The Fed will eventually have to react to this monetary situation with some rate hikes, possibly taking the Fed funds rate to 7% or higher by the end of 2007. However, the Fed would like to remain easy-peasy, so it will generally be “behind the curve” in its actions.

4) “Goldilocks” will be dead as an investment hypothesis.

5) The S&P 500 will at some point be 20% below its high point for the preceding bull rally, but it may close the year down only 12% or so. In terms of ounces of gold, however, the losses for equities will be enormous (50%+).

6) Monetary order will be disturbed as the dollar makes new lows against foreign currencies in 1H07, Other governments will at first be willing to let the dollar sink. However, pretty soon (2H07) they will take action to prevent their currencies from rising too much against the dollar, with all the trade consequences that implies. Thus, all governments will effectively devalue their currencies alongside the dollar, producing worldwide inflation.

The thing that would really cinch a “back to the 1970s” outcome is new highs for gold vs. the dollar ($750/oz. or higher), setting off a very quick move to $900+. I think this is fairly likely going forward, although there are no certainties.

Sprott: The Downfall of the Dollar
Much has been made of the Dow being up 15% this year, but when measured in other currencies (especially the “real” currencies, gold and silver) the performance of the Dow has been far from stellar. In Euro terms, the Dow has gained an unimpressive 3% this year. Against gold, the Dow is actually down almost 6%. Against silver, the Dow has lost over 26% this year! Is there really a bull market in US equities? These facts often get lost in the over-exuberance that is mainstream financial media. The weakness in the dollar is making things look better than they really are from the perspective of Americans who, to date, have suffered little from the debasement of their currency. Whether this continues to be the case next year remains to be seen, but we believe time is running out. We consider this the critical issue for financial markets going into 2007.

POLITICAL ECONOMY (Middle East/Iraq)

Newsweek: Iraq’s Economy is Booming
Civil war or not, Iraq has an economy, and—mother of all surprises—it’s doing remarkably well. Real estate is booming. Construction, retail and wholesale trade sectors are healthy, too, according to a report by Global Insight in London. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce reports 34,000 registered companies in Iraq, up from 8,000 three years ago. Sales of secondhand cars, televisions and mobile phones have all risen sharply. Estimates vary, but one from Global Insight puts GDP growth at 17 percent last year and projects 13 percent for 2006. The World Bank has it lower: at 4 percent this year. But, given all the attention paid to deteriorating security, the startling fact is that Iraq is growing at all
[interesting comments to this article on Kudlow's blog]

Cedric Muhammad: How Iraq Could Have Been Stabilized
There can be no unity when inflation rates touch 70% as has been the case in Iraq as recently as August. With inflation rates still over 50% and an exchange rate that is operated by the Iraqi central bank under an impossible managed peg regime, the case has now gone from the evidence of 2003 to a state of proof three years later, that fatal mistakes and errors were made early-on in the planning (and lack thereof) laying the ground work for economic development and growth. It is hard to imagine that the United States government believed that everything depended upon an oil revenue grab, but the evidence suggests a second thought wasn’t given to other important economic basics.

Brenner: The Economics of the Rise of Ahmadinejad
Power is dispersed within democracies, and democracies are always weakened when more money flows through government hands. This is true even when the facade of democracy persists. When more capital sifts through the government, more groups depend on government handouts and have less access to sources of capital that are independent from the ruling political parties.
Conversely, when capital markets are opened, the risk that one-party states will emerge diminishes. As independent sources of capital surface, political power is dispersed and lasting prosperity follows. Thus, it is a mistake to promote democracy without first establishing the ground for letting people have access to capital and collateral — or at least coordinating such access with political change. After all, prosperity is the result of matching people with capital, while holding both sides accountable.
What happens when societies either do not have or destroy their financial markets?
That’s how one-party states such as Ahmadinejad’s Iran emerge: People bet on crazy ideologies when their customary ways of living suddenly crumble and capital markets close. Capital markets are the unique feature of the West, and their democratization is the key to the civilizing process and the best insurance against the emergence of one-party states. Indeed, that’s what the U.S. should have been “exporting” all along in the Middle East, coordinating the promotion of capital markets with the necessary political changes in Iraq.

….

There’s certainly a lot of food for thought in these articles and while I can’t honestly say I agree with or even understand some of what these experts are saying; I can pretty much make one prediction for 2007, with a fair amount of accuracy: no matter where you are or what you’re doing in the new year, one thing’s pretty much certain that real estate / property will no doubt have an even greater impact on our lives in 2007. But of-course, I could be just saying that; I am after all the RealEstate Enthusiast!
Happy New Year everyone.

Manhattan gets ready for "Bonus Bump"

December 26, 2006 at 12:09 pm | In luxury, manhattan, wall street | Leave a Comment

This year belonged to London, but it seems like in 2007, all eyes in the real estate world will be focused on Manhattan as Wall Street announces record bonuses for 2006.
Wendy Maitland, VP at NYC’s Corcoran; claims that she is already seeing the effects of the “bonus bump” at her Manhattan office. In this Real Deal interview, she highlights the $2-5 million residential market is seeing a lot of activity since November 15th, and the over $5 million market is “absolutely” booming.
It appears as well that the Wall Street high-fliers prefer condo’s over co-ops
[Wendy's interview starts about 1min30secs]

Bonuses paid in US$?

December 13, 2006 at 4:59 pm | In city, economy, ftse, london, wall street | Leave a Comment

Yes we’re all waiting for the record bonuses to be paid out this year and for London real estate to give us another stellar performance – but wait – the bonuses are paid in US$? And the US$ is now nearly 2 to 1 against the sterling? So – are we really looking at a record?

Manchester’s answer to Canary Wharf

October 23, 2006 at 10:48 am | In city, commercial, manchester, wall street | Leave a Comment

The Sunday Times highlighted Manchester mayor Sir Howard Bernstein’s attempt to “woo” Wall Street firms to the north England city; along with Mike Ingall CEO of Allied London, the company behind Spinningfields – Manchester’s answer to Canary Wharf.
According to the article, Bank of New York is bringing 750 new jobs to the city, which Bernstein and Ingall hope will convince more to do the same. In the next few years a slew of financial regulation is expected to increase the amount of back-office work that banks have to undertake in Europe. There are 42 new directives being foisted on the EU financial-services sector in the next three years.

Banks such as Goldman Sachs or Merrill Lynch are never going to give up their prestigious Wall Street or City of London addresses. But, Bernstein and Ingall hope, they may be convinced to ship the burdensome back-office work up north rather than out east. Rents in the City are about £55 a square foot and in the West End they are close to £100. Rents in Manchester are about £25 a square foot. Rents and wages in India are far lower, but they are rising and there are other factors at play. “How sustainable is it for people to ship off everything to Bangalore in the long term?” said Bernstein. He pointed to Powergen’s decision to move its call-centre operations back to Britain to improve customer relations. “And if you look at the City of London or Wall Street, it’s obvious that financial and professional-services companies want to be close together,” he said.

Time to buy housing stocks!

September 12, 2006 at 7:22 pm | In ftse, investment, stock market, usa, wall street | Leave a Comment
Barron’s is recommending equity investors seriously look into buying housing stocks

Summary: Weak home sales, growing inventories, dwindling orders and falling prices have all contributed to a weakening housing market. Hardest struck have been the home builders, who are off as much as 65% from last summer’s highs. But with the investment community firmly entrenched in their bearish outlook, the time to consider catching some bargain-basement prices in housing stocks may be rapidly approaching. Various companies are analyzed in depth (see “Highlighted companies” above, particularly those in bold), considering factors such as book value (many home builders presently trade at or below book value) and price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) — home builders currently average about 6. While it’s possible the current lull is just the beginning of a full-out bust of the housing boom, similar to the tech-stock-bubble bust of the late 1990’s, bulls counter that such factors as relatively low interest rates, a still expanding economy, and positive demographic factors bode well for the sector. Many top investors, while admitting they were too early in buying-in to the group, are sticking with the sector, sensing the bottom is near or “within squinting distance.” While conceding that “it may be early for housing-related stocks,” Bary concludes that with its attractive valuations, the housing market may bottom sooner than later, especially if signs of recovery begin to emerge or if the Fed starts cutting rates, and that these previously battered stocks could take a sharp upturn way before any corresponding growth in profits.

[source]

Russian real estate group to list in London

June 9, 2006 at 8:34 am | In ftse, wall street | Leave a Comment

A new Russian commercial property developer has announced plans to float on Aim in spite of the volatile stock market conditions. FF&P Russia Real Estate Development aims to raise $300m (£163m), which will be invested alongside local developers in Moscow and other Russian cities.
FT.com

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.