Extate now running adverts

October 12, 2007 at 3:21 pm | In advertising, extate, marketing, search | 1 Comment

Spotted today on Extate.co.uk are adverts for Knight Frank, Savills, Miller Homes and Mortgage Angels. At the bottom of the search results is a link worded “Your Online Guide to Mortgages” which seems to be a mortgage quotation service apparently provided by Mortgage Angels.
Sam Sethi recently explained that Extate had incorporated the Openads advertising platform, which would give Extate the opportunity to provide local solicitors, removal companies and other businesses the opportunity to “advertise to a highly targeted audience.”
The only problem with the Extate model is traffic, something Extate currently lacks. Extate founder Artemi Krymski and I discussed this problem a few weeks ago, and he refused to reveal specific numbers, but in a Blognation comment, Krymski claimed that Extate traffic was “now beginning to approach 1M”, an ambiguous comment, if there ever was one, after all, the numeral ‘one’ is a number that approaches one million. Unconfirmed figures put Extate traffic at a steady 50,000 visitors per month, but so far nothing forthcoming officially from them.
If Extate is truly serious about marketing their advertising platform, and if they expect it to take off, they will have to quickly reveal traffic numbers to the general public. However, with the likes of Knight Frank advertising on the service, no doubt there’s something good brewing behind the scenes

Zoomf’s new logo

June 6, 2007 at 7:06 pm | In marketing, property2.0, search, start up, zoomf | 2 Comments

It’s been a while since we’ve heard anything from Zoomf, the London based 2.0 property search company that recently got a major round of VC funding. Since then, it seems things have gone pretty quiet for Zoomf but while browsing the site this afternoon, I noticed their new logo which in my opinion looks a lot more grown up than their old one, but also reminds me of Redfin’s old logo, before they switched to their current one (apparently because of a legal challenge from Move.com )

This is big, I mean really big

April 6, 2007 at 9:29 am | In google, google maps, marketing, search | 2 Comments

Google’s MyMaps launch yesterday is bound to cause a social networking revolution similar to what MySpace did a few years ago. OK, maybe not that big, but it’s definitely gonna be big impact for all (or most) of the new real estate vertical search engines, because – to some degree, GOOG is now letting Joe Public do for himself, what Nestoria and others have been doing/developing for us in recent months/years. Plus GOOG have the marketing clout (i.e loads and loads of cash) to completely obliterate anybody who stands in their way with a similar idea. I honestly dont know how MyMaps will affect business models of the new vertical searchsites, but it will most certainly affect the way they plan to make money, and more than likely their future potential in raising venture financing and much needed liquidity.
Joel Burslem, writing for Inman’s blog, gives some insight in what we may very well see in the not too distant future:

MyMaps … allows anyone to create a customized map and turns all of us into potential cartographers. Using the service you can quickly add placemarks and draw lines and shapes to show boundaries or routes on a Google Map, instantly creating your own mashup. You can even embed photos and YouTube videos.
MyMaps’ applications in real estate are endless in my mind; a buyers agent could create an map of all the properties they wanted to show a buyer and email them a link of the route they’ll be taking. Or, a broker could create a map of all the open houses they might be showing on a particular weekend. Any other ideas you can think of?
The only thing missing from this release is the ability to embed your maps in your own web site or blog but I suspect that it won’t be long before we can.

Foxtons new mini

March 25, 2007 at 8:38 am | In agents, foxtons, marketing | Leave a Comment

The problem with Foxtons marketing

March 9, 2007 at 8:41 am | In agents, foxtons, marketing, technology | Leave a Comment

Foxtons have been doing some aggressive (and technically impressive) guerrilla marketing lately. However I wonder about their overall strategy, and a lot seems to be timed with their well publicized IPO intentions or in an effort to score a private equity buyout.
Looking at the Foxtons video advert, reminds me of a conversation I had with a friend recently who reminded me that you hardly ever see anybody over 30 working at Foxtons; which is great for sex appeal, but not so good when trying to sell property in London. In essence, Foxtons appear to be trying to appeal to a younger, more tech savvy demographic, but the problem is that most young tech savvy people in London can’t afford or don’t buy property in London. And the few that can and do, well why would they use Foxtons, given their less than stellar reputation.

I’m going to assume that the company makes the bulk of their revenue from lettings. I’m basing this on the fact that they’re so obviously appealing to young people, and young London may not buy, but they sure do rent.
This poses another problem since a lot of landlords – especially those that have significant portfolios – are dubious about doing business with the big F(u), a company that has been known to and caught on camera forging landlords signatures. Nevertheless, the company has been making strides to clean up their act, and joining the Ombudsman Scheme for Estate Agents was definitely a big step, although they’re not yet members of the more influential and credit worthy National Association of Estate Agents.

Trump on Letterman

January 8, 2007 at 10:28 am | In donald trump, marketing, media | Leave a Comment

In the midst of Rosie vs Donald, Trump visited Letterman last week to once again, tell his side of the story. The most interesting exchange:
Trump: I help somebody and she calls me a pimp …
Letterman: but you wouldn’t mind being a pimp, if everything else went away
Trump: nods head in apparent agreement.


In more Trump news, peep this interview, where Don Jr describes his Dad as “the brand” and that “there are times when it may be exaggerated, but it’s pretty much him… hopefully we can perpetuate that.”
Season 6 of Trump’s Apprentice premiered last night on NBC

Rightmove goes international/Is Miles in the house?

January 4, 2007 at 1:45 pm | In marketing, rightmove | Leave a Comment

Rightmove.co.uk recently launched Rightmove Overseas, a service which includes maps and country guides and currently yields 44,000 listings from over 70 countries. The portal also has imminent plans for a major TV ad campaign starting on ITV, Channel 4, Channel Five and a mix of the most popular satellite stations.

BUT IS MILES IN THE HOUSE?
When I checked Rightmove’s executive page this afternoon Miles Shipside is no longer listed as commercial director; in fact he’s no longer listed period, and there seems to be major re-construction of the executive team. No doubt changes have been made since the Countrywide split.
Update – 05/01/07 10:50
Miles is still in the house; here’s the correct link to his profile courtesy the Rightmove PR team (thanks guys)

MyBlogLog hacked?

December 29, 2006 at 10:38 am | In blogging, marketing, technology | 4 Comments

A lot of us real estate bloggers have been using the recently launched MyBlogLog as another social networking platform. But there’s an apparent flaw in the service which makes it relatively easy for a users domain to be hacked. It seems like there is no verification system on MBL which means that anybody can sign up to the service choosing to use any domain they want without having to prove that they’re the ones who own or control it:

in order to claim my piece of the MyBlogLog pie I go to register where I can upload my own photo and hopefully claim my own blog. As an idealist, I’m assuming that MyBlogLog should offer blog owners some kind of code for doing so, in the same tradition of Technorati. You know what though, they do not:
This is a pretty major problem with MyBlogLog, as the owner of a blog, I should be able to claim that blog as my own. But judging from the sign up process, there is not a blog verification system for doing so. For a company which is part of the Yahoo family (or soon going to be), such simple verification measures should be a given.

So far on the MBL blog, there’s no mention of the flaw or any attempts to fix it; however this raises an even bigger question for RE bloggers and the importance of trying to create a brand using web 2.0 as a platform . With so many social networking platforms being built and peer pressure to sign up to all of them, the search guru reminds us of two important to consider while building your web 2.0 brand:

1. Are you monitoring everywhere on all the Web 2.0 sites where you could possibly have your own brand “hijacked” ?
2. Are the Web 2.0 services secure enough to prevent this type of identity hacking from happening in the future?

Important questions to ask going into the new year as Time magazine reminds us.

Estate Agents, the Internet and the KKK (Freakonomics 101)

November 16, 2006 at 9:00 am | In agents, bubble, marketing, nestoria, search | 6 Comments

According to Freakonomics, the Klu Klux Klan was a power group much like estate agents; deriving its power in large part from the fact that it hoarded information. Once that information falls into the wrong hands (or, depending on your point of view the right hands), much of the groups advantage then disappears.
Nestoria’s “large database of property listingsled them to take a look at how estate agents describe their properties and according to Ed; “we can’t find a single bad property!”


Back to Freakonomics:

On page 68 of the bestselling book, the writers proclaim information as “the currency of the Internet.” According to Levitt, the net is “brilliantly efficient at shifting information from the hands of those who have it into the hands of those who do not. Often … the information existed, but in a woefully scattered way [but the internet] has vastly shrunk the gap between the experts and the public.”
Levitt cites a study of estate agents in the US revealing how agents attempt to convey information in the for sale ads they write:

A phrase like “well maintained,” for instance means that a house is old but not quite falling down. A savvy buyer will know this (or find out for himself once he sees the house), but to the sixty-five year old retiree who is selling the house, “well maintained” might sound like a compliment, which is just what the agent intends.
An analysis of the language used in real-estate ads shows that certain words are powerfully correlated with the final sale price of a house. This doesn’t necessarily mean that labeling a house “well maintained” causes it to sell for less than an equivalent house. It does however indicate that when an agent labels a house “well maintained”, she is subtly encouraging the buyer to bid low.

Levitt claims that if the ad words for a estate agents own home are analyzed, the agent places an emphasis on descriptive terms (“new,” “granite,” “maple,” “move-in condition,” ) and avoids empty adjectives (including “wonderful,” “immaculate,” “well-maintained”).

Ed’s fascinating observations about UK property descriptions include:

* Properties are more than twice as likely to be “spacious” as they are to be “massive”.
* There are more “excellent” properties then there are “stunning” properties
* Fewer properties “boast” features than “benefit” from features

(Ed also revealed that he spent the last year in a bedroom where he could “touch all four walls,” and although he’s about 6′3 – 6′4, it still came as a shock to him that there were so many ’spacious’ properties available. Who knows, maybe he should have got a better agent, and of course because Nestoria wasn’t around back then we’ll have to give him a pass.)

What’s fascinating is the cryptic rise of internet power and the democratic shift of power in the real estate world. Witness for example the popularity and influence of London’s Rat and Mouse weblog; started by a self-confessed “property porn addict” (there’s so many), a guy who – it appears – really had no professional background in real estate.
Ed, Ivalio and others readily admit that the drive for them to start writing search scripts came from the individual frustration and to some degree desperation they experienced while searching for a home here in London.
Right now, the UK property market is hot and overheating; but for the most part, estate agents and property professionals are happy, well fed, and quite nonchalant. Most are acting like it’s going to stay like this forever. Wake up call – it’s not.
This too shall pass is what the wise say to themselves.
Witness the so-called “bubble” in the US and the way agents in that part of the world are (to a degree reluctantly) embracing the internet information power shift. If you can’t beat ‘em; join ‘em seems to be the ethos amongst US property professionals. They kicked up a storm when Zillow and Redfin entered the marketplace and – overnight – radically shifted the way people searched for property. But a few months later, they defend them.
The same hasn’t happened over here, because things are good.
Nestoria, Rat and Mouse and others are encroaching the UK market at a time when nobody in professional property is really paying too much attention to them. These services are viewed by most property professionals as novelties. But there is no doubt that these services are radically shifting the way people in the UK search for property. And there’s no doubt that – as the bubble begins to burst – property people will begin to pay closer attention.

Foster "brand" denotes premium

October 24, 2006 at 10:52 am | In celebrity, design, development, marketing, moscow | Leave a Comment

Even as the impetuous Lord Norman Foster is about to reap millions for the redesign of Moscow’s infamous Rossiya Hotel; news is that he also charges a premium for “designed by Norman Foster” to be included in sales and marketing literature.
Nick Johnson, of Manchester based Urban Splash claims that:
“There was a stipulation in the fee agreement that we could not use ‘Norman Foster’ himself in association with the building unless we came to a separate agreement which . . . would require the payment of a further fee.”
When Urban Splash launched an advertisement campaign promoting a development designed by Foster and Partners, claiming it was a Norman Foster design; they received a letter of complaint from Foster’s lawyers. The row was settled after Urban Splash pointed out that Foster had appeared in a video to promote the scheme. “He has become really aware of using his brand and image in the way David Beckham has,” claims a source close to Foster

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.