How Is a Real Estate Bubble Great for the Economy?
May 9, 2007 at 3:17 pm | In bubble | 2 CommentsArticle by Tim Iacono
A new book by Daniel Gross will be out next week. With an eye-catching 60’s era cover and an intriguing title, Pop!: Why Bubbles Are Great for the Economy, the real suspense lies in what the Slate columnist has to say about what some call the biggest one of them all – the world-wide housing bubble.
The premise appears to be that, despite the mania associated with rapid economic change, where businessmen, investors, and much of the populace lose their collective heads bidding up share prices for railroad companies or dot coms, technological innovation proceeds at a rapid pace and after the inevitable popping, something good is left behind.
While it is clear that better transportation and low-cost broadband for all have had a beneficial impact after all the gains and losses had been tallied and the last teary eye had been dried, the lasting good after speculative manias in tulip bulbs and, more recently, housing is less certain.
Bubbles–from hot stocks in the 1920s to hot stocks in the 1990s–are much-lamented features of contemporary economic life. Time and again, American investors, seduced by the lures of quick money, new technologies, and excessive optimism, have shown a tendency to get carried away. Time and again, they have appeared foolish when the bubble burst. The history of finance is filled with tragic tales of shattered dreams, bankruptcies, and bitter recriminations.
But what if the I-told-you-so lectures about bubbles tell only half the story? What if bubbles accomplish something that can only be seen in retrospect? What if the frenzy of irrational economic enthusiasm lays the groundwork for sober-minded opportunities, growth, and innovation? Could it be that bubbles wind up being a competitive advantage for the bubble-prone U.S. economy?
In this entertaining and fast-paced book–you’ll laugh as much as you cry–Daniel Gross convincingly argues that every bubble has a golden lining. From the 19th-century mania for the telegraph to the current craze in alternative energy, from railroads to real estate, Gross takes us on a whirlwind tour of reckless investors and pie-in-the-sky promoters, detailing the mania they created–but also the lasting good they left behind.
In one of the great ironies of history, Gross shows how the bubbles once generally seen as disastrous have actually helped build the commercial infrastructures that have jump-started American growth. If there is a secret to the perennial resilience and exuberance of the American economy, Gross may just have found it in our peculiar capacity to blow financial bubbles–and successfully clean up the mess.
Well, that was a fine choice of words – millions of us wondering how the mess that Greenspan made is going to be successfully cleaned up. Many observers are willing to give the former Fed chairman a pass on the whole late-1990s technology boom because of all the fiber optic cable that was left laying around is now being put to good use.
Despite all the hand-wringing, something good was left behind.
But what good can be expected to linger after all the bad real estate loans are called in and activity in the homebuilding industry reverts back to levels where ordinary people buy ordinary houses just one at a time?
When the history is written, it is more likely that the housing bubble will be seen as just an easy-money fling for the stock-averse majority of the population who just sat, watched, and wondered about Amazon.com and their ilk in the late 1990s.
The Financial Times provided this review:
But could it be that the cassandras have it all wrong and that bubbles are actually a blessing, not a curse? This is the heretical idea advanced in a provocative book, Pop! Why Bubbles are Great for the Economy, which sketches out a history of the bubbles that have swept through America over the past 150 years. . . . an entertaining primer on market madness. . . thoroughly accessible to a broad audience. . . But brutal or not, Gross’s thesis is a thought-provoking one for modern investors, particularly given that the bubble phenomenon shows no sign of disappearing.
The suspense is just killing me.
Aside from being an after-effect of some other event, such as late 19th century land booms when the next leg of the railroad was announced and towns sprung up out of nowhere, how is a real estate bubble great for an economy?
Does it have something to do with granite countertops?
Subprime meltdown: New Century virtually bankrupt
March 27, 2007 at 6:54 pm | In bubble, subprime, wall street | Leave a Comment
If this is a “shade of the new blue chip”, then we’re all in deep shit!
[From WSJ via Seeking Alpha]
Analysts are speculating that New Century Financial, the beleaguered subprime mortgage lender, will shortly file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Their evidence is the disclosure that Barclays and Morgan Stanley, two of New Century’s main lenders, are repossessing loans that had been used to secure financing. New Century will hand over the loans it made with Barclays credit lines; in exchange, it will be forgiven the obligation to buy back $900 million of those loans. Morgan Stanley will auction off $2.48 billion of New Century subprime mortgages that constitute the collateral behind New Century’s $2.5 billion credit line from the investment bank. Stifel Nicolaus analyst Christopher Brendler: Both banks “felt so uncomfortable with” New Century’s ability to repay them that “they decided to just take the loans and auction them off themselves…I’m surprised that New Century hasn’t filed for bankruptcy already.” All New Century’s lenders are pulling their financing, and it has received default notices from Barclays, Bank of America, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, among others. If all its lenders demand mortgage repurchases simultaneously, New Century could owe $8.4 billion, an impossible sum that would force the company’s liquidation.
The Economist covers housing
March 26, 2007 at 6:20 pm | In bubble, housing market, media, subprime | Leave a Comment
Unfortunately, I don’t have an online subscription, but the teaser reads quite lovely …
JUNE is National Homeownership Month in America. National Foreclosure Month would be more apt. Some corners of the mortgage market—notably subprime loans aimed at those with poor credit records—have a nasty case of dry rot.…
US lender halts loans as housing slows
January 4, 2007 at 9:48 am | In bubble, mortgage, repos, usa | Leave a Comment
Is this the “pop” in the bubble?
Mortgage Lenders Network USA Inc. stopped making new loans through its wholesale arm, becoming the third mortgage company in a month to curtail operations as housing sales slowed and defaults by borrowers rose.
Executive Vice President James Pedrick: “The economics of this market are not good, and it deals with the performance of loans, and to a lesser extent the value of homes,”Pedrick confirmed that the company won’t fund any more mortgages arranged by brokers, even if they’ve already received final approval. “We’re talking to a group of Wall Street firms about the feasibility of an alliance,” such discussions would have to conclude within a “short window of time,” he said, because employees may start looking for other jobs.
One Maryland client received approval last week to refinance a $300,000 mortgage with two mortgages from MLN totaling $350,000, The man planned to use the $50,000 in extra cash for renovations. MLN is “not taking phone calls, we can’t get through, now we’re going to have to try and resubmit a loan application somewhere else.”BANKRUPTCY
Lenders including Ownit Mortgage Solutions Inc. and Sebring Capital Partners LP, which also specialize in “sub-prime” mortgages, were among companies that closed operations and cut staff in 2006 as loans to high-risk customers soured. Nationwide, late payments on sub-prime loans rose during the third quarter to 12.56 percent of the total, the most since the first quarter of 2003, the U.S. Mortgage Bankers Association said.
Ownit, based in Agoura Hills, California, and the 16th- biggest issuer of sub-prime home loans, filed for bankruptcy court protection last week. Sebring, of Carrollton, Texas, closed in December. Morgan Stanley bought mortgage lender Saxon Capital Inc. for $706 million early last month and announced plans to slash 170 jobs.
bkeoun@bloomberg.net
UPDATE: January 15th 2007
MLN is now claiming “human error” caused it to lend $600 million at below-market rates, fueling losses that led to the closure of its biggest unit.
Estate Agents, the Internet and the KKK (Freakonomics 101)
November 16, 2006 at 9:00 am | In agents, bubble, marketing, nestoria, search | 6 CommentsAccording to Freakonomics, the Klu Klux Klan was a power group much like estate agents; deriving its power in large part from the fact that it hoarded information. Once that information falls into the wrong hands (or, depending on your point of view the right hands), much of the groups advantage then disappears.
Nestoria’s “large database of property listings” led them to take a look at how estate agents describe their properties and according to Ed; “we can’t find a single bad property!”
On page 68 of the bestselling book, the writers proclaim information as “the currency of the Internet.” According to Levitt, the net is “brilliantly efficient at shifting information from the hands of those who have it into the hands of those who do not. Often … the information existed, but in a woefully scattered way [but the internet] has vastly shrunk the gap between the experts and the public.”
Levitt cites a study of estate agents in the US revealing how agents attempt to convey information in the for sale ads they write:
A phrase like “well maintained,” for instance means that a house is old but not quite falling down. A savvy buyer will know this (or find out for himself once he sees the house), but to the sixty-five year old retiree who is selling the house, “well maintained” might sound like a compliment, which is just what the agent intends.
An analysis of the language used in real-estate ads shows that certain words are powerfully correlated with the final sale price of a house. This doesn’t necessarily mean that labeling a house “well maintained” causes it to sell for less than an equivalent house. It does however indicate that when an agent labels a house “well maintained”, she is subtly encouraging the buyer to bid low.
Levitt claims that if the ad words for a estate agents own home are analyzed, the agent places an emphasis on descriptive terms (“new,” “granite,” “maple,” “move-in condition,” ) and avoids empty adjectives (including “wonderful,” “immaculate,” “well-maintained”).
Ed’s fascinating observations about UK property descriptions include:
* Properties are more than twice as likely to be “spacious” as they are to be “massive”.
* There are more “excellent” properties then there are “stunning” properties
* Fewer properties “boast” features than “benefit” from features
(Ed also revealed that he spent the last year in a bedroom where he could “touch all four walls,” and although he’s about 6′3 – 6′4, it still came as a shock to him that there were so many ’spacious’ properties available. Who knows, maybe he should have got a better agent, and of course because Nestoria wasn’t around back then we’ll have to give him a pass.)
What’s fascinating is the cryptic rise of internet power and the democratic shift of power in the real estate world. Witness for example the popularity and influence of London’s Rat and Mouse weblog; started by a self-confessed “property porn addict” (there’s so many), a guy who – it appears – really had no professional background in real estate.
Ed, Ivalio and others readily admit that the drive for them to start writing search scripts came from the individual frustration and to some degree desperation they experienced while searching for a home here in London.
Right now, the UK property market is hot and overheating; but for the most part, estate agents and property professionals are happy, well fed, and quite nonchalant. Most are acting like it’s going to stay like this forever. Wake up call – it’s not.
This too shall pass is what the wise say to themselves.
Witness the so-called “bubble” in the US and the way agents in that part of the world are (to a degree reluctantly) embracing the internet information power shift. If you can’t beat ‘em; join ‘em seems to be the ethos amongst US property professionals. They kicked up a storm when Zillow and Redfin entered the marketplace and – overnight – radically shifted the way people searched for property. But a few months later, they defend them.
The same hasn’t happened over here, because things are good.
Nestoria, Rat and Mouse and others are encroaching the UK market at a time when nobody in professional property is really paying too much attention to them. These services are viewed by most property professionals as novelties. But there is no doubt that these services are radically shifting the way people in the UK search for property. And there’s no doubt that – as the bubble begins to burst – property people will begin to pay closer attention.
Kendra Todd: "the bubble is a myth"
October 12, 2006 at 2:04 pm | In bubble, celebrity, kendra todd, media, usa | 5 Comments
Former Apprentice winner and author Kendra Todd, claims that “the bubble is a myth”:
Talking about a bubble implies a sudden burst, and real estate does not work that way. You don’t go to sleep one night with your house worth half a million dollars and wake up to find it’s lost half its value. Also, the real estate market is a regional phenomenon based on all kinds of factors: migration to or from an area, job growth and local economies. So while there is no bubble, there are areas in the U.S. that are experiencing corrections that will continue over the next six to 24 months. There are also markets that will appreciate over that same period. The trick is keeping your cool and taking advantage of the opportunities.
Her advice to investors is to focus on the “secondary markets” and highlighted Tucson, AZ and Orlando, FL as examples.
link
Central London property – “the highest since Blair came to power”
October 4, 2006 at 5:14 am | In bubble, debt, housing market, london, research | Leave a CommentAccording to Liam Bailey at Knight Frank Research:
“Prices in central London now stand 23.5% higher than they did only 12 months ago. This is the highest rate of growth in prices since June 1997 when the annualised rate was 25%. Prices jumped for the most expensive homes in the Capital by 2.2% in September alone. September was an extraordinary month for the prime London market. Buyers came back into the market in serious numbers after the summer break. Our records reveal that the number of buyers registered to purchase property in central London is 111% higher than the same period last year.”
Other highlights from the report:
• Central London property prices grew by 23.5% in the 12 months to September 2006 – the highest rate of price growth since June 1997, the previous peak marked Tony Blair’s first election victory
• The summer slowdown lasted one month, with August’s 1% growth replaced by 2.2% growth in September
• Immense demand for prime London properties together with a noticeable lack of stock has been the key driver of sharp upward movement in price growth
• We report approximately 50% less supply on the market this September compared to the same month last year
Once again, serious shit for London.
[via Knight Frank]
Princenton professor: US bubble "completely unprecedented"
September 12, 2006 at 6:01 pm | In bubble, economy, usa | Leave a CommentQuote: “If history is any guide, house prices got a long way to fall … we dont know how fast”
Australia market collapse
September 6, 2006 at 12:13 pm | In australia, bubble | Leave a CommentFirst Sydney, now Brisbane …
London’s most expensive, but is the capital overheating?
September 6, 2006 at 9:30 am | In bubble, london, luxury | Leave a CommentRead more via Miller Samuel
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
